Propositional Logic - Semantics

There are various types of logical connectives which are used in complex wffs. The ones we shall focus on consist of the conjunction, disjunction, and negation. In order to define these operators, we will have to introduce interpretation and valuation. The following topics will be categorized under the topic of logical semantics.

Semantics are rules for assigning truth values to wffs.

An Interpretation is a function that takes propositional letters as an input and assigns a single truth value. An interpretation:

  1. To interpret proposition P, put it in the interpretation function so that I(P)=T. This is read as “P is true under interpretation I.
  2. A proposition can be interpreted in two possible ways, but one interpretation cannot give both truth values. IE: $ I_1 (P)=T, I_2 (P)=F $
  3. Every propositional variable can be put in the interpretation function
  4. For n distinct propositional letters, there are $ 2^n $ interpretations.

The last point can be expressed in the context of truth tables.

Truth tables present every possible combination of interpretations and the truth values of compound propositions derived from the simpler ones. Each row or interpretation is called a possible world.

Below we see that there are two possible worlds in table 2 due to the fact that $ 2^1 = 2 $ and table 3 has 8 possible worlds since $ 2^3 = 8 $. Deriving any other wffs from these atomic wffs will not add possible worlds.

I

P

$ I_1 $

T

$ I_2 $

F

Table 2

I

P

Q

R

$ I_1 $

T T T

$ I_2 $

T T F

$ I_3 $

T F T

$ I_4 $

T F F

$ I_5 $

F T T

$ I_6 $

F T F

$ I_7 $

F F T

$ I_8 $

F F F

Table 3

Given certain interpretations of propositional letters, we can solve for the truth values of complex wffs.

A valuation is defined as followed, for any interpretation I, a valuation v of a wff is a function that assigns one truth value to each wff.

In the following scenarios we will use P and Q will be variables for a wff and R will be a variable for any propositional letter. Thus, we can state that:

$ v(R)=I(R) $

Figure 1

Figure 1 shows that whatever interpretation a proposition is given, will also be equivalent to the valuation of the same proposition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

National Accounting - Consumption and Investment

Conceptual Analysis