Propositional Logic - Transformations of the Conditional
Contrapositive
The contrapositive of a conditional statement is equivalent to the conditional statement.
A contrapositive takes the conditional P→Q, then derives ¬Q→¬P.
The best way to think about this is via modus tollens.
However, you can also prove P→Q≡¬Q→¬P:
P |
Q |
¬P |
¬Q |
P→Q |
¬Q→¬P |
T |
T | F | F | T | T |
T |
F | F | T | F | F |
F |
T | T | F | T | T |
F |
F | T | T | T | T |
Table 13
Another example of showing equivalency can be via natural language. Let us say the conditional proposition states that, “If I study hard, then I will pass.” The contrapositive would state that, “If I do not pass, then I have not studied hard.” This is somewhat common sensical.
Converse
A converse is not equivalent to the conditional.
A converse takes the conditional P→Q, then derives Q→P.
An example in natural language is to take the conditional, “If it’s a dog, then it’s a mammal” and deriving, “If it’s a mammal, then it’s a dog.” This is obviously incorrect since there could be a non-dog mammal.
Inverse
An inverse is not equivalent to the conditional.
An inverse takes the conditional , then derives .
An example in natural language is to take the conditional,
“If it’s a dog, then it’s a mammal” and deriving, “If it’s not a dog, then it’s
a mammal.” This is obviously incorrect since there could be a non-dog animal.
It is also neat to note that: Q→P≡¬P→¬Q
P |
Q |
P→Q |
¬P→¬Q |
T |
T | T | T |
T |
F | F | T |
F |
T | T | F |
F |
F | T | T |
Table 14
Comments
Post a Comment